« F**K Iran, Lets Start A WAR With Canada! | Main | Hiking: A Retrospective, or Two Slices of Rye Toast Will Only Get You So Far »

harry potter v

so, here's a review with spoilers, since all of us have read the books, i believe. if not, tough luck.

oh, and i realize that my opinion is in the toilet because of the whole children of men thing. all i can say is: shut the hell up.

Laura and I saw the film last night. and so did a 2 year old. and about 300 other people who crammed into the Lowes Cherry Hill (the finest cinema in Cherry Hill). The 2-year-old voiced it's disgust with the film about half way through. fortunately, it's mother decided to walk it all the way across the front of the auditorium before commanding it to 'walk up the steps!' right next to me. had the child been 3, i might have kicked it's mother. but a 2-year-old doesn't need to see that shit. of course, maybe it was 3. can a 2 year old walk?

anyway. the film.

i enjoyed the film. it's certainly lacking every secondary plot from the book. Sirius doesn't stomp around, whining about how he's not helping the order. the house-troll "kreatcher" doesn't end up revealing the location of the house (which I thought was a major event in the novel, but whatever.) the battle with the death eaters and the kids at the end is more coherent than the book (no brain-suckers and running through doorways) but still just as silly (seriously -- "stupify!" is shouted out 15 times. and the deatheaters aren't doing anything to defend themselves. until the Order of the Pheonix shows up and they have all sorts of cool spells. ridiculous! they are DEATH EATERS. they shouldn't be that easily knocked around. )

the film really lacks the great banter between the 3 main characters. it's sorely lacking in this one. and part of that is the book's fault -- harry is so ANGRY the whole time. But in the film, he's not angry for as long. in fact, he's pretty much over his spat with ron and hermione about the whole 'you knew about the order and i didn't' stuff about 30 minutes into the movie.

but once they are all friends, there is literally one scene where they have the kind of friendship we've come to enjoy through the books and the movies. (there are 2-3 brief moments where ron & hermione talk/flirt, and harry does get to kiss Cho, but there's no chemistry between anyone).

Ultimately, it's fun and there's less of the recapping that the other films seem to do. but the reduction of the secondary storylines really leaves the movie with nothing much to do and plenty of time to do it. one of the great things about the film is dolores umbridge. she's great. in fact, probably the best performance in any of the films. she really steals every scene she's in. although, their her scenes, so she can't steal them. snape is usually the one that's THIS good -- where he owns the character and you couldn't imagine anyone else playing him. she's actually worth the price of admission, and is used enough that it's worth it. snape is only in 2 scenes in this one and i was surprised, but pleased, that they included the scene where harry sees snape's memories. of course, there's little time/room for harry to lament his father's assholeishness, but whatever. maybe the next movie will get more emo.

Again -- i actually enjoyed it, but I can see how it would be viewed as less textured. there's 1 moment between harry & malfoy, and that's in the beginning. hargid shows up about 30 minutes before the end with his half-brother, quickly explains where he's been, and then 15 minutes later the kids are back in the woods with Dolores and she's gone. if i hadn't read the book i would scream plot device. but i guess there was just no way to do the ending without hagrid's half-brother. still, they could have brought them back sooner, added another scene with the kids feeding him, and then it would have seemed a bit less of a deus ex machina (alright, so it's not technically a deus ex machina, but you get the point).

the directing was pretty good. i felt that the opening sequence with the dementors and Harry's annoying cousin was done really well and set the tone for the film. there were some great tense moments with voldemort trying to scare harry in his dreams and in real life. the fight between Voldemort and Dumbledor is amazing. when voldemort is trying to take over harry's body after the fight, well that was a bit silly. it didn't translate well (there are some shots of voldemort just 'posing' that, i guess, are taking place in Harry's mind? they were dumb.)

the cinematography has moments of inventiveness, too. also, the school looked great, with flourishes in all the right places and consistency where we'd notice (the dining hall looks the same, as do the moving stairs, but the room of necessity was fantastic as was the ministry of magic).

Ultimately, i enjoyed it more than the first 2 (which were done by Chris Columbus and therefore are really boring, but i guess work as simple kids movies), but considering the amount of material there was to work with, i was surprised that it felt less textured than the last one, which itself had been reduced to simply a string of competitions. but at least there was some Quidditch in there. i can't say which is my favorite because i kinda have an issue with 3, 4 & 5 that prevents me from watching them over and over. (3 has that whole time travel thing that makes the ending repetitive; 4 has a really basic structure that seems cramped in the 2nd half.)

Anyway. let me know what you all think when you get a chance to see it!

Comments

Evan, your opinion is now even MORE in the toilet for liking that steaming pile of crap "Smokin' Aces."

But I agree with you on HP5. I thought it was the second-best of the adaptations. 3 is the absolute best in my opinion, mostly because of the director. Like you said, 4 suffers from being pared down so much to just the string of competitions, and the first two were just eh.

Of course they had to trim this one down extensively too, which always takes away a lot of the charm of the books, but at least here I think they did a good job of making the plot coherent in the movie, even though it differs widely from the book.

I thought the acting in this one (by the kids - the adults are always fantastic) was significantly better than in the other four. The Harry Potter kid actually did a really good job here, where before he was just kind of adequate. The new girl, Luna, was so good that I was sad they had to cut so much of her plot out. And Umbridge did a great job of being just as horrible in the movie as she is in the book. Personally, I love Alan Rickman as Snape - although there wasn't much of him here, his scenes are always my favorite in these movies.

We saw it at (TFKA) the Ritz, at 10 pm, and it was surprisingly more than half empty. Everyone was probably at the shore, thank goodness. And no annoying kids! People who take their small children to movies in the evening should be fined. Don't those kids have the be in bed, or something? I don't think I saw a movie in the movie theater that wasn't a matinee until I was like sixteen.

So anyway, Evan, your opinion about movies may have improved slightly now. But I don't think anyone has forgotten that you're a big fan of the early work of Adam Sandler.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)